OK. Thanks for all of the suggestions.
Cheers
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:erik.hatc...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2011 3:27 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene->SOLR transition
On Sep 18, 2011, at 19:43 , Michael Sokolov wr
On 9/19/2011 5:27 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
On Sep 18, 2011, at 19:43 , Michael Sokolov wrote:
On 9/15/2011 8:30 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
2. Assuming that the answer to 1 is "correct", then is there an easy way
to take a lucene query (with nested Boolean queries, filter queries, etc.) and g
On Sep 18, 2011, at 19:43 , Michael Sokolov wrote:
> On 9/15/2011 8:30 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
>>
>> 2. Assuming that the answer to 1 is "correct", then is there an easy
>> way to take a lucene query (with nested Boolean queries, filter queries,
>> etc.) and generate a SOLR query string w
On 9/15/2011 8:30 PM, Scott Smith wrote:
2. Assuming that the answer to 1 is "correct", then is there an easy way
to take a lucene query (with nested Boolean queries, filter queries, etc.) and generate a
SOLR query string with q and fq components?
I believe that Query.toString() will p
Hi Scott, now your queries are going to be created by a QueryParser. you
have a couple of options here, most common are LuceneQueryParser,
DismaxQueryParser and ExtendedDismaxQueryParser, but there are others. The
QueryParser will be creating all those queries you mentiones, for example,
if you are
Hi
Scott Smith, il 16/09/2011 02:30, ha scritto:
I've been using lucene for a number of years. We've now decided to move to
SOLR. I have a couple of questions.
1. I'm used to creating Boolean queries, filter queries, term queries,
etc. for lucene. Am I right in thinking that for SOL
I've been using lucene for a number of years. We've now decided to move to
SOLR. I have a couple of questions.
1. I'm used to creating Boolean queries, filter queries, term queries,
etc. for lucene. Am I right in thinking that for SOLR my only option is
creating string queries (with q
