That is why I'm storing
the non lowercased version of the field - with that I do not loose
information.
You do not loose information when you store lowercased version of the field.
Koji
--
http://www.rondhuit.com/en/
On 02/25/2011 03:02 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (11/02/25 18:30), Tarjei Huse wrote:
>> Hi,
>> On 02/25/2011 02:06 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
>>> (11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and sto
(11/02/25 18:30), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
On 02/25/2011 02:06 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and stored while caseInsensitiveBody is just indexed.
The idea is that by not s
Hi,
On 02/25/2011 02:06 AM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
> (11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
>> Body is indexed and stored while caseInsensitiveBody is just indexed.
>>
>> The idea is that by not storing the caseInsensit
(11/02/24 20:18), Tarjei Huse wrote:
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and stored while caseInsensitiveBody is just indexed.
The idea is that by not storing the caseInsensitiveBody I save some
space and gain some performance. So I query ag
Hi,
I got an index where I have two fields, body and caseInsensitiveBody.
Body is indexed and stored while caseInsensitiveBody is just indexed.
The idea is that by not storing the caseInsensitiveBody I save some
space and gain some performance. So I query against the
caseInsensitiveBody and gener
