Re: Soft commit and new replica types

max time is 300 sec then commit happens every > > 300 > > > > sec > > > > > > on > > > > > > > > tlog leader. And new segments pop up on the leader every 300 > > sec, > > > > > > d

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

t; > > > > > that on all other tlog replicas(not leaders) commit occurs > every > > > > poll? > > > > > > > воскресенье, 09 декабря 2018г., 19:21 +03:00 от Erick Erickson > > > > > > > erickerick...@gmail.com : &

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

... > > > > > > > > > > > > > >This has always bothered me a little bit, I wonder at the > utility > > > of a > > > > > > >config param. We already have old-style replication with a > > > > > > >co

RE: Soft commit and new replica types

searcher(it may be called soft commit). -- Vadim > -Original Message- > From: Edward Ribeiro [mailto:edward.ribe...@gmail.com] > Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 8:27 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Soft commit and new replica types > > Hi Tomás, >

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

M Vadim Ivanov > > > > < vadim.iva...@spb.ntk-intourist.ru> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, Edward, for clues. > > > > > What bothers me is newSearcher start, warming, cache clear... all > > that &

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

ru> wrote: > > > > > > > > Thanks, Edward, for clues. > > > > What bothers me is newSearcher start, warming, cache clear... all > that > > > CPU consuming stuff in my heavy-indexing scenario. > > > > With NRT I had autoSoftComm

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

ry replica. > > > To have more or less the same effect with TLOG - PULL collection, > > > I suppose, I have to have : 300000 > > > (yes, I understand that newSearchers start asynchronously on leader and > > replicas) > > > Am I right? > > >

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

ollection, > > I suppose, I have to have : 30 > > (yes, I understand that newSearchers start asynchronously on leader and > replicas) > > Am I right? > > -- > > Vadim > > > > > >> -Original Message- > >> From: Edward Ribeiro [

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:42 AM >> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Soft commit and new replica types >> >> Some insights in the new replica types below: >> >> On Sat, December 8, 2018 08:42, Vadim Ivanov < >&g

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

--- > > From: Edward Ribeiro [mailto:edward.ribe...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Sunday, December 09, 2018 12:42 AM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Soft commit and new replica types > > > > Some insights in the new replica types below: > > > > On

RE: Soft commit and new replica types

018 12:42 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Soft commit and new replica types > > Some insights in the new replica types below: > > On Sat, December 8, 2018 08:42, Vadim Ivanov < > vadim.iva...@spb.ntk-intourist.ru wrote: > > > > > Fr

Re: Soft commit and new replica types

Some insights in the new replica types below: On Sat, December 8, 2018 08:42, Vadim Ivanov < vadim.iva...@spb.ntk-intourist.ru wrote: > > From Ref guide we have: > " NRT is the only type of replica that supports soft-commits..." > "If TLOG replica does become a l

Soft commit and new replica types

hat new Searcher always starts on all replicas when hard commit happens on leader? Some words in Ref Guide about new replica types in section #commit-and-softcommit seems to be usefull. -- Vadim

Re: New replica types

Comments inline: On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 11:39 AM, S G wrote: > AFAIK, tlog file is truncated with a hard-commit. > So if the TLOG replica is only pulling the tlog-file, it would become out > of date if it does not pull the full index too. > That means that the TLOG

Re: New replica types

AFAIK, tlog file is truncated with a hard-commit. So if the TLOG replica is only pulling the tlog-file, it would become out of date if it does not pull the full index too. That means that the TLOG replica would do a full copy every time there is a commit on the leader. PULL replica, by definition

Re: New replica types

On 1/2/2018 8:02 PM, S G wrote: If the above is incorrect, can someone please point that out? Assuming I have a correct understanding of how the different replica types work, I have some small clarifications. If my understanding is incorrect, I hope somebody will point out my errors. TLOG

New replica types

Hi, I was excited to see some good work in having more replica types for Solr. However, Solr documentation left me with a few questions. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_2/shards-and-indexing-data-in-solrcloud.html#types-of-replicas This is what I could come up with: (Note that each