Re: Not (!) operator

This is good idea Thanks Alex. On May 28, 2016 12:59 AM, "Alexandre Rafalovitch" wrote: > If you are worried about performance, bake the present/absent as a > signal in a separate field during the document processing as a special > UpdateRequestProcessor sequence. > > Regards, > Alex. > > ---

Re: Not (!) operator

If you are worried about performance, bake the present/absent as a signal in a separate field during the document processing as a special UpdateRequestProcessor sequence. Regards, Alex. Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: http://www.solr-start.com/ On 27 May

Re: Not (!) operator

Hi Shawn, Thanks for reply. i am also worried wither performance. I will check if there is another way to design the documents in case of parent and child relationship. Regards, Anil On 27 May 2016 at 12:39, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 5/26/2016 11:13 PM, Anil wrote: > > We have status text field

Re: Not (!) operator

On 5/26/2016 11:13 PM, Anil wrote: > We have status text field in our solr document and it is optional. > search query status: !Closed returning documents with no status as > well. how to get only documents having status and it is !Closed ? one > way is status:* AND status:!Closed . any other way ?

Not (!) operator

HI, We have status text field in our solr document and it is optional. search query status: !Closed returning documents with no status as well. how to get only documents having status and it is !Closed ? one way is status:* AND status:!Closed . any other way ? Thanks Regards, Anil

Re: ExtendedDismax and NOT operator

Yes, it is. Geert Van Huychem IT Consultant iFrameWorx BVBA Mobile: +32 497 27 69 03 E-mail: ge...@iframeworx.be Site: http://www.iframeworx.be LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/geertvanhuychem On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Alexei Martchenko wrote: > Just to clarify: the actual url is pro

Re: ExtendedDismax and NOT operator

Just to clarify: the actual url is properly space-escaped? http://localhost:8983/solr/distrib/select?q=term1%20NOT%20 term2&start=0&rows=0&qt=edismax_basic&debugQuery=true alexei martchenko Facebook | Linkedin| S

Re: ExtendedDismax and NOT operator

bject: ExtendedDismax and NOT operator Hi This is my config: edismax body title^30 introduction^15 body^10 0 Executing the following link: http://localhost:8983/solr/distrib/select?q=term1 NOT term2&start=0&rows=0&qt=edismax_basic&debugQuery=true

ExtendedDismax and NOT operator

Hi This is my config: edismax body title^30 introduction^15 body^10 0 Executing the following link: http://localhost:8983/solr/distrib/select?q=term1 NOT term2&start=0&rows=0&qt=edismax_basic&debugQuery=true gives me as debuginfo: (+(DisjunctionMaxQuery

Re: Solr edismax NOT operator behavior

uly 27, 2012 1:55 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Solr edismax NOT operator behavior Hello, I am using Edismax parser and query submitted by application is of the format price:1000 AND ( NOT ( launch_date:[2007-06-07T00:00:00.000Z TO 2009-04-07T23:59:59.999Z] AND product_type:electronic)). Sol

Solr edismax NOT operator behavior

( NOT portion of the query . Please can any one explain me how this structure is handled. I am using solr 3.6 Any help is appreciated .. Thanks Alok -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-edismax-NOT-operator-behavior-tp3997663.html Sent from the Solr

Re: NOT operator not working

thanks that helps -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NOT-operator-not-working-tp2365831p2389803.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: NOT operator not working

q=(sharp+AND+-deviceType:Access*) that is not the query type of dismax for q operator (deviceType:Access*). either you use as Filter query or write query like q=(sharp AND -Access*) - Thanx: Grijesh -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NOT-operator-not

Re: NOT operator not working

--- On Fri, 1/28/11, abhayd wrote: > From: abhayd > Subject: NOT operator not working > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Friday, January 28, 2011, 8:45 AM > > i have a field in xml file Accessory Data > / Memory > solr schema field declared as    name

NOT operator not working

s*) Any thoughts what i m doing wrong? -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/NOT-operator-not-working-tp2365831p2365831.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Query about NOT (-) operator

: But below query does not work : 2. (NOT(IBA60019_l:1) AND NOT(IBA60019_l:0)) AND : businessType:wt.doc.WTDocument boolean queries must have at least one "positive" expression (ie; MUST or SHOULD) in order to match. the solr query parser tries to help with this and if the *outermost* B

Query about NOT (-) operator

Hi, The query 1. NOT(IBA60019_l:1) AND NOT(IBA60019_l:0) AND businessType:wt.doc.WTDocument works But below query does not work 2. (NOT(IBA60019_l:1) AND NOT(IBA60019_l:0)) AND businessType:wt.doc.WTDocument Query number 1 shows the records but Query number 2 do