gt; -Mike
>
>
>
> On 6/5/2014 8:47 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Solr is good at caching: even if first "cold" query takes longer time, the
>> subsequent one is much quicker, given that it shares the fq's of the first
>> query.
&
uery takes longer time, the
subsequent one is much quicker, given that it shares the fq's of the first
query.
This is more like an idea question:
what about the out-of-vocabulary (OOV) queries? According to my quick
measurements, they take same amount of time when repeated and return
nothing
Hi,
Solr is good at caching: even if first "cold" query takes longer time, the
subsequent one is much quicker, given that it shares the fq's of the first
query.
This is more like an idea question:
what about the out-of-vocabulary (OOV) queries? According to my quick
measurements,
