Re: Partial Match with DF

Thank you for the heads up! I think in some cases we will want to strip out punctuation but in others we might need it (for example, "liquid courage." should tokenize to "liquid" and "courage", while "1.5 oz liquid courage" should tokenize to "1.5", "oz", "liquid" and "courage"). I'll have to do

Re: Partial Match with DF

Wow, that's really powerful! Thank you! On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:19 AM, Charlie Hull wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Open Source Connection's excellent www.splainer.io might also be useful to > help you break down exactly what your query is doing. > > Cheers > > Charlie > > P.S.

Re: Partial Match with DF

Hi Mark, Open Source Connection's excellent www.splainer.io might also be useful to help you break down exactly what your query is doing. Cheers Charlie P.S. planning a blog soon listing 'useful Solr tools' On 16 March 2017 at 14:39, Mark Johnson wrote: >

Re: Partial Match with DF

Yeah, they've saved me on numerous occasions, glad to see they helped. One caution BTW when you start changing fieldTypes is you have to watch punctuation. StandardTokenizerFactory won't pass through most punctuation. WordDelimiterFilterFactory breaks on non alpha-num, including punctuation

Re: Partial Match with DF

You're right! The fields I'm searching are all "string" type. I switched to "text_en" and now it's working exactly as I need it to! I'll do some research to see if "text_en" or another "text" type field is best for our needs. Also, those debug options are amazing! They'll help tremendously in the

Re: Partial Match with DF

My guess: Your analysis chain for the fields is different, i.e. they have a different fieldType. In particular, watch out for the "string" type, people are often confused about it. It does _not_ break input into tokens, you need a text-based field type, text_en is one example that is usually in

Re: Partial Match with DF

Oh, great! Thank you! So if I switch over to eDisMax I'd specify the fields to query via the "qf" parameter, right? That seems to have the same result (only matches when I specify the exact phrase in the field, not just certain words from it). On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Alexandre

Re: Partial Match with DF

df is default field - you can only give one. To search over multiple fields, you switch to eDisMax query parser and fl parameter. Then, the question will be what type definition your fields have. When you search text field, you are using its definition because of copyField. Your original fields

Partial Match with DF

Forgive me if I'm missing something obvious -- I'm new to Solr, but I can't seem to find an explanation for the behavior I'm seeing. If I have a document that looks like this: { field1: "aaa bbb", field2: "ccc ddd", field3: "eee fff" } And I do a search where "q" is "aaa ccc", I get