s message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-issue-Frange-with-geodist-tp3417962p3427820.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
s:
>>>
>>> Click here to see 2 results in a radius of 10km.
>>> Click here to see 11 results in a radius of 50km.
>>> Click here to see 19 results in a radius of 100km.
>>>
>>> With geodist() and facet.query is this possible but the performance
e performance isn't
>> very good..
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-issue-Frange-with-geodist-tp3417962p3418429.html
>> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sincerely yours
> Mikhail (Mike) Khludnev
> Developer
> Grid Dynamics
> tel. 1-415-738-8644
> Skype: mkhludnev
> <http://www.griddynamics.com>
>
>
ery is this possible but the performance isn't
> very good..
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-issue-Frange-with-geodist-tp3417962p3418429.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
us of 50km.
Click here to see 19 results in a radius of 100km.
With geodist() and facet.query is this possible but the performance isn't
very good..
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-issue-Frange-with-geodist-tp3417962p3418429.html
Sent from
> problem is every request had another location with other distances and
> results. So almost every request takes ~1400ms. Do i have to make the cache
> bigger? I don't think it's possible to cache it all.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.
quest takes ~1400ms. Do i have to make the cache
bigger? I don't think it's possible to cache it all.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-issue-Frange-with-geodist-tp3417962p3418263.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
works but it's very slow. The Qtime is
> between 1400ms and 1800ms. Is there a way to win performance? or something
> else to get the same response?
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-issue-Frange-with-geodist-tp3417962p341
works but it's very slow. The Qtime is
between 1400ms and 1800ms. Is there a way to win performance? or something
else to get the same response?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-issue-Frange-with-geodist-tp3417962p3417962.html
Sent from the Solr -
