Mickael,
I just wonder you have considered BlockJoin? it performs much better than
query time approaches
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2012/08/block-join-query-performs.html ,but
faceting hasn't been implemented for it yet.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Mickael Magniez
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Retry
Hi,
Retry on a better machine (2CPU, 8GB RAM, 1.5GB for java half used according
admin interface) still have the same issue.
It seems to grow with matches count : with a search matching 100k documents,
it takes 700ms, vs 70ms without ngroup (CPU is 100% during request)
For information, my index
: Mickael Magniez
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 10:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Performance issue with group.ngroups=true
Hi,
I have a performance issue with group.ngroups=true parameters.
I have an index with 100k documents (small documents, 1-10 documents per
group, group
Hi,
I have a performance issue with group.ngroups=true parameters.
I have an index with 100k documents (small documents, 1-10 documents per
group, group on string field), if i make a q=*:*&...&group.ngroups=true i
have 4s responsetime vs 50ms without the ngroups parameters.
Is it a wo
