gt; The art of being wise is the art of knowing what to overlook.
> -- William James
>
>
>
> Jay Hill wrote:
> >
> > The string fieldtype is not being tokenized, while the text fieldtype is
> > tokenized. So the stop word "for" is being removed b
e example dir and look at the default
> configuration for both the text and string fieldtypes. String string
> fieldtype is not analyzed whereas the text fieldtype has a number of
> different filters that take action.
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Phil Chadwick
> wrote:
>
>
t
configuration for both the text and string fieldtypes. String string
fieldtype is not analyzed whereas the text fieldtype has a number of
different filters that take action.
-Jay
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Phil Chadwick
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to figure out why phrase
Hi,
I'm trying to figure out why phrase matching on a text field only works
some of the time.
I have a SOLR index containing a document titled "FUTURE DIRECTIONS FOR
INTEGRATED CATCHMENT". The "FOR" seems to be causing a problem...
The title field is indexed as both s_
