Ah, indeed :)
Thanks,
.Alek
On Oct 14, 2008, at 3:21 PM, Steven A Rowe wrote:
Hi Alek,
On 10/13/2008 at 8:29 PM, Aleksandar Bradic wrote:
For custom faceting of numerical fields (and similar
applications), it would be super-useful if the list of
terms for each numerical field in the index (a
Hi Alek,
On 10/13/2008 at 8:29 PM, Aleksandar Bradic wrote:
> For custom faceting of numerical fields (and similar
> applications), it would be super-useful if the list of
> terms for each numerical field in the index (accessible
> via FieldCache.StringIndex.lookup), could be stored in
> numerical
Hi !
For custom faceting of numerical fields (and similar applications), it
would be super-useful if the list of terms for each numerical field in
the index
(accessible via FieldCache.StringIndex.lookup), could be stored in
numerical rather than "natural" (alphabetical) order.
(For exampl
