Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-10 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
; From: David Boxenhorn > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 5:02:01 AM > Subject: Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop > > Thanks, Jonathan. Your explanation is very helpful. > > Can you explain exactly what you mean by "phrases created from the entire

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-10 Thread David Boxenhorn
Thanks, Jonathan. Your explanation is very helpful. Can you explain exactly what you mean by "phrases created from the entire query"? On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote: > What you said in your own quoted message is correct. qs is slop applied to > phrases explicitly in t

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-07 Thread Jonathan Rochkind
What you said in your own quoted message is correct. qs is slop applied to phrases explicitly in the &q with double quotes. ps is slop applied to the phrases created from the entire query for evaluating pf boosts. qs will (potentially) change your result set. ps will only (potentially) change

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-07 Thread David Boxenhorn
Got it! Thanks a lot. On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 3:00 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote: > > > ps = ? - something that affects boosting, but how? > > Lets say your query is apache solr. (without quotation marks) > > Lets say these three documents contains all of these words and returned. > > 1-) solr is built

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-07 Thread Ahmet Arslan
> ps = ? - something that affects boosting, but how? Lets say your query is apache solr. (without quotation marks) Lets say these three documents contains all of these words and returned. 1-) solr is built on the top of apache lucene. 2-) apache solr is fast, mature and popular. 3-) solr is hos

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-07 Thread David Boxenhorn
d out of the entire "q" param. > > qs (Query Phrase Slop) affects matching. If you play with qs, numFound > changes. This parameter is about when you have explicit phrase query in your > raw query. i.e. &q="apache lucene" > > --- On Thu, 10/7/10, David Boxenh

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-07 Thread Ahmet Arslan
> From: David Boxenhorn > Subject: Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Date: Thursday, October 7, 2010, 11:34 AM > Does anybody know the answer to > this? > > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:19 PM, David Boxenhorn > wrote: > > > Thank

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-07 Thread David Boxenhorn
Does anybody know the answer to this? On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:19 PM, David Boxenhorn wrote: > Thank you. I am talking about dismax's parameters. > > This is how I understand things, please tell me where I'm wrong: > > Query slop (qs) = how many words you can move the query to match the text. >

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-05 Thread David Boxenhorn
Thank you. I am talking about dismax's parameters. This is how I understand things, please tell me where I'm wrong: Query slop (qs) = how many words you can move the query to match the text. Phrase slop (ps) (when used in conjunction with &pf=text - is there another possibility?) = how many words

Re: Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-05 Thread Ahmet Arslan
> Can anyone explain to me the > practical difference (i.e. in terms of results) > between query slop and phrase slop? I think you are asking about dismax's parameters, right? ps (Phrase Slop) is about pf parameter. qs (Query Phrase Slop) : You cannot use tilde operator with dismax, so this par

Query slop vs. phrase slop

2010-10-05 Thread David Boxenhorn
Can anyone explain to me the practical difference (i.e. in terms of results) between query slop and phrase slop?