On 14-May-07, at 10:05 PM, James liu wrote:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the correct
descending score-sorted order. You have to perform that sort
manually.
i mean merged results(from 60 p) and sort it, not solr's sort.
ev
maybe full-text search sort correct not very import.
2007/5/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
>
> > thks for your detail answer.
> >
> > but u ignore "sorted by score"
> >
> > p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
> thks for your detail answer.
>
> but u ignore "sorted by score"
>
> p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
>
> maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
>
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the c
On 14-May-07, at 8:55 PM, James liu wrote:
thks for your detail answer.
but u ignore "sorted by score"
p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
I'm not ignoring it: I'm implying that the above is the correct
descending score-sorted order. You have to pe
for example, i wanna query "lucene", it's numFound is 234300.
and results should sorted by score.
if u do, how to pagination and sort it's score?
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 7:15 PM, James liu wrote:
> if i set rows=(page-1)*10,,,it will lose more result whi
thks for your detail answer.
but u ignore "sorted by score"
p1, p2,p1,p1,p3,p4,p1,p1
maybe their max score is lower than from p19,p20.
so it will not sorted by score correctly.
and if user click page 2 to see, how to show data?
p1 start from 10 or query other partitions?
2007/5/15, Mike Kl
On 14-May-07, at 7:15 PM, James liu wrote:
if i set rows=(page-1)*10,,,it will lose more result which fits query.
how to set start when pagination.
I'm not sure I understand the question.
When combining results from partitions, you can't use startAt. You
must always assemble the docs fro
On 14-May-07, at 6:49 PM, James liu wrote:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
When you get up to 60 partitions, you should make it a multi stage
process. Assuming your partitions are disjoint and evenly
distributed, estimate the number of do
if i set rows=(page-1)*10,,,it will lose more result which fits query.
how to set start when pagination.
2007/5/15, James liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
>
> > if use multi index box, how to pagination with
2007/5/15, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
> if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score
> correctly?
>
> for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by
> score.
>
> i don't know the num found from every index box wh
On 14-May-07, at 1:35 AM, James liu wrote:
if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score
correctly?
for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by
score.
i don't know the num found from every index box which have different
content.
if promise 10 page wit
if use multi index box, how to pagination with sort by score correctly?
for example, i wanna query "search" with 60 index box and sort by score.
i don't know the num found from every index box which have different
content.
if promise 10 page with sort score correctly, i think solr 's start is 0
12 matches
Mail list logo
