Just send a query for that core I think
Erick
On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 11:14 AM, vybe3142 wrote:
> On a related note, ..
> In our application, the cores can get moderately large , and since we
> mostly
> use a subset of them on a roughly LRU basis, the dynamic core loading
> seems
> a good
On a related note, ..
In our application, the cores can get moderately large , and since we mostly
use a subset of them on a roughly LRU basis, the dynamic core loading seems
a good fit. We interact with our solr server via a solrj client.
That said, we do require the capability to access older c
Thanks so much for the answer, and for "JIRA-fying" it.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Question-on-Lots-Of-cores-How-do-I-know-it-s-working-tp4099847p415.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hmmm, not really, you have to kind of take it on faith I'm afraid.
You can check the Solr logs and you should see messages about
cores unloading, but that's not very satisfactory.
Actually sounds like a JIRA. See SOLR-5430
On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Vinay B, wrote:
> As I understand it,
As I understand it, the "lots of cores" features enables dynamic loading
and unloading of cores
This is how I set up my solr.xml for a test where I created more cores than
the transientCacheSize.
Here is a link to the config in case it doesn't format well via this post.
https://gist.github.com/ano
