On 6/7/2018 12:19 AM, kotekaman wrote:
sorry. may i know how to code it?
Code *what*?
Here's the same wiki page that I gave you for your last message:
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
Even if I go to the Nabble website and discover that you've replied to a
topic that's SEVEN A
sorry. may i know how to code it?
--
Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
On 19.12.2010, at 23:30, Alexey Serba wrote:
>
> Also Ephraim proposed a really neat solution with GROUP_CONCAT, but
> I'm not sure that all RDBMS-es support that.
Thats MySQL only syntax.
But if you google you can find similar solution for other RDBMS.
regards,
Lukas Kahwe Smith
m...@pooteew
> With subquery and with left join: 320k in 6 Min 30
It's 820 records per second. It's _really_ impressive considering the
fact that DIH performs separate sql query for every record in your
case.
>> So there's one track entity with an artist sub-entity. My (admittedly
>> rather limited) experien
CPU.
>
> James Dyer
> E-Commerce Systems
> Ingram Content Group
> (615) 213-4311
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ephraim Ofir [mailto:ephra...@icq.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:04 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Dataimport pe
213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Ephraim Ofir [mailto:ephra...@icq.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 3:04 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Dataimport performance
Check out
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/20
[mailto:rob...@dubture.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2010 4:49 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Dataimport performance
i've benchmarked the import already with 500k records, one time without the
artists subquery, and one time without the join in the main query:
Without sub
Can you do just one join in the top-level query? The DIH does not have
a batching mechanism for these joins, but your database does.
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 7:11 AM, Tim Heckman wrote:
> The custom import I wrote is a java application that uses the SolrJ
> library. Basically, where I had sub-enti
The custom import I wrote is a java application that uses the SolrJ
library. Basically, where I had sub-entities in the DIH config I did
the mappings inside my java code.
1. Identify a subset or "chunk" of the primary id's to work on (so I
don't have to load everything into memory at once) and put
i've benchmarked the import already with 500k records, one time without the
artists subquery, and one time without the join in the main query:
Without subquery: 500k in 3 min 30 sec
Without join and without subquery: 500k in 2 min 30.
With subquery and with left join: 320k in 6 Min 30
so t
2010/12/15 Robert Gründler :
> The data-config.xml looks like this (only 1 entity):
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> name="sf_unique_id"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
So there's one track entity with an artist sub-entity. My (admittedly
rather l
We are currently running Solr 4.x from trunk.
-d64 -Xms10240M -Xmx10240M
Total Rows Fetched: 24935988
Total Documents Skipped: 0
Total Documents Processed: 24568997
Time Taken: 5:55:19.104
24.5 Million Docs as XML from filesystem with less than 6 hours.
May be your MySQL is the bottleneck?
Reg
> What version of Solr are you using?
Solr Specification Version: 1.4.1
Solr Implementation Version: 1.4.1 955763M - mark - 2010-06-17 18:06:42
Lucene Specification Version: 2.9.3
Lucene Implementation Version: 2.9.3 951790 - 2010-06-06 01:30:55
-robert
>
> Adam
>
> 2010/12/15 Robert Gründ
You're adding on the order of 750 rows (docs)/second, which isn't bad...
have you profiled the machine as this runs? Even just with top (assuming
unix)...
because the very first question is always "what takes the time, getting
the data from MySQL or indexing or I/O?".
If you aren't maxing out you
What version of Solr are you using?
Adam
2010/12/15 Robert Gründler
> Hi,
>
> we're looking for some comparison-benchmarks for importing large tables
> from a mysql database (full import).
>
> Currently, a full-import of ~ 8 Million rows from a MySQL database takes
> around 3 hours, on a QuadCo
15 matches
Mail list logo
