On 9/21/2011 4:22 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
I think the problem is that the config needs to be inside of the
config, rather than after it as your have.
Thank you, that took care of it. With mergeFactor set to 8 and the TMP
options set to 35, it merges after 35 segments.
Shawn
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Michael Sokolov wrote:
> I wonder if config-file validation would be helpful here :) I posted a patch
> in SOLR-1758 once.
Big +1.
We should aim for as stringent config file checking as possible.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
I wonder if config-file validation would be helpful here :) I posted a
patch in SOLR-1758 once.
-Mike
On 9/21/2011 6:22 PM, Michael Ryan wrote:
I think the problem is that the config needs to be inside of the
config, rather than after it as your have.
-Michael
I think the problem is that the config needs to be inside of the
config, rather than after it as your have.
-Michael
On 9/21/2011 11:18 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
With no mergeFactor defined, maxMergeAtOnce and segmentsPerTier seem
to be ignored. I've got both set to 35, but Solr is merging every 10
segments. I haven't tried explicitly setting mergeFactor yet to see
if that will make the other settings overrid
On 9/21/2011 3:10 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: With no mergeFactor defined, maxMergeAtOnce and segmentsPerTier seem to be
: ignored. I've got both set to 35, but Solr is merging every 10 segments. I
...
: Here's the relevant config pieces. These two sections are in separate files
: inc
: With no mergeFactor defined, maxMergeAtOnce and segmentsPerTier seem to be
: ignored. I've got both set to 35, but Solr is merging every 10 segments. I
...
: Here's the relevant config pieces. These two sections are in separate files
: incorporated into solrconfig.xml using xinclude:
On 9/20/2011 4:09 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
yes, mergeFactory=10 is interpreted as both segmentsPerTier and
maxMergeAtOnce. yes, specifying explicit TieredMP parameters will
override whatever you set in mergeFactor (which is basically only
interpreted to be backwards compatible) this is why i crea
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Burton-West, Tom wrote:
> Thanks Robert,
>
> Removing "set" from " setMaxMergedSegmentMB" and using "maxMergedSegmentMB"
> fixed the problem.
> ( Sorry about the multiple posts. Our mail server was being flaky and the
> client lied to me about whether the messag
r setting ignored?
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 7:09 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Example setting TieredMergePolicy for Solr 3.3 or 3.4?
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Burton-West, Tom wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The TieredMergePolicy has become the default with Solr 3.3, but the
> configuration in the example uses the mergeFactor setting which applys to the
> LogByteSizeMergePolicy.
>
> How is the mergeFactor interpreted by the Tiered
11 matches
Mail list logo