s,
> Markus
>
> -Original message-
> > From:Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org>
> > Sent: Thursday 15th September 2016 10:12
> > To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Facetting on a field doesn't work, until i optimized the
> index
> >
t;
> Sent: Thursday 15th September 2016 10:12
> To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Facetting on a field doesn't work, until i optimized the index
>
> Markus,
>
> Could you spot more details about this particular field type? How do
Markus,
Could you spot more details about this particular field type? How does
'empty set of facets' look like? Is there results in that query?
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Markus Jelsma
wrote:
> Hello - we've just spotted the weirdest issue on Solr 6.1.
>
> We
gt; > Markus
>> >
>> > -----Original message-
>> >> From:Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
>> >> Sent: Wednesday 14th September 2016 17:22
>> >> To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
>> >> Subjec
rom:Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Wednesday 14th September 2016 17:22
> >> To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> >> Subject: Re: Facetting on a field doesn't work, until i optimized the
> index
> >>
> >> That's
> To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: Facetting on a field doesn't work, until i optimized the index
>>
>> That's strange
>>
>> Is there any chance that the schema changed? This is _really_ a shot
>> in the dark, but perhaps the opt
streaming
in. But i'm not sure it would anyway.
Thanks,
Markus
-Original message-
> From:Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Wednesday 14th September 2016 17:22
> To: solr-user <solr-user@lucene.apache.org>
> Subject: Re: Facetting on a field doesn't
That's strange
Is there any chance that the schema changed? This is _really_ a shot
in the dark, but perhaps the optimize "normalized" the field
definitions stored with each segment.
Imagine segments 1-5 have one definition, and segments 6-10 have a
different definition for your field.