> > What is an equivalent fieldType definition in Solr 3.5?
>
>
>
>
OK, and if I would reindex, is this still the best practice config for
german text?
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:09 PM, Lance Norskog wrote:
> Has the GermanAnalyzer behavior changed at all? This is another kind
> of mismatch, and it can cause very subtle problems. If text is
> indexed and queried using different Analyzers, queries will not do
> what you think they should.
It acts
Has the GermanAnalyzer behavior changed at all? This is another kind
of mismatch, and it can cause very subtle problems. If text is
indexed and queried using different Analyzers, queries will not do
what you think they should.
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 1:38 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14,
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:58 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm switching from Lucene 2.3 to Solr 3.5. I want to reuse the existing
> indexes (huge...).
If you want to use a Lucene 2.3 index, then you should set this in
your solrconfig.xml:
LUCENE_23
>
> In Lucene I use an untweaked org.apache.lucene.a
