Hi Edwin,
Thanks for your explanation, makes sense now.
Best regards
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: 30. juni 2019 01:57
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Hi,
If you are using the type
urned.
>
> Best regards
>
> Martin
>
>
> Internal - KMD A/S
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jörn Franke
> Sent: 11. juni 2019 08:45
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
>
> Could it be a stop
örn Franke
Sent: 11. juni 2019 08:45
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading of the
documents?
> Am 03.0
Hi Edwin,
Yes the field is defined just like the other fields:
BR
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo
Sent: 4. juni 2019 10:32
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Hi Martin,
What fieldType are you
-Original Message-
From: Jörn Franke
Sent: 11. juni 2019 08:45
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading of the
Could it be a stop word ? What is the exact type definition of those fields?
Could this word be omitted or with wrong encoding during loading of the
documents?
> Am 03.06.2019 um 10:06 schrieb Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) :
>
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For s
Hi David,
Thanks for your response and sorry my late reply.
Still the same result when using hl.method=unified.
Best regards
Martin
Internal - KMD A/S
-Original Message-
From: David Smiley
Sent: 10. juni 2019 16:48
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: highlighting not working as expected
Please try hl.method=unified and tell us if that helps.
~ David Smiley
Apache Lucene/Solr Search Developer
http://www.linkedin.com/in/davidwsmiley
On Mon, Jun 3, 2019 at 4:06 AM Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For some reason
>
Hi Martin,
What fieldType are you using for the field “Sagstitel”? Is it the same as
other fields?
Regards,
Edwin
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 at 16:06, Martin Frank Hansen (MHQ) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am having some difficulties making highlighting work. For some reason
> the highlighting feature only work
heon.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 10:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
Were you ever able to resolve this issue? I am having same issue and
highligh is not working for me on solr 4.8?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.
Were you ever able to resolve this issue? I am having same issue and highligh
is not working for me on solr 4.8?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Highlighting-not-working-tp4112659p4142513.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
because of the "term*=true"
settings.
Thanks again,
Fatima
> -Original Message-
> From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:02 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
>
> Hi
hoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 5:02 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Highlighting not working
>
> Hi Fatima,
>
> To enable higlighting (both standard and fastvector) you need to make
> stored="true".
>
> Term vector
Hi Fatima,
To enable higlighting (both standard and fastvector) you need to make
stored="true".
Term vectors may speed up standard highlighter. Plus they are mandatory for
FastVectorHighligher.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Field+Properties+by+Use+Case
Ahmet
On Wednes
Also my highlighting defaults...
on
content documentname
html
0
documentname
3
200
content
750
> -Original Message-
> From: Fatima Issawi [mailto:issa...@qu.edu.qa]
> Sent: Wednesda
Problem solved. *bangs head on desk*
T
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
> field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
> one of several fields configured appropriately (e.g. "cv_text_en") a
> I guess what I'm asking is - can Solr
> highlight non-indexed fields?
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldOptionsByUseCase
I guess what I'm asking is - can Solr highlight non-indexed fields?
Tom
On 7 April 2011 11:33, Tom Mortimer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble getting highlighting to work for a large text
> field. This field can be in several languages, so I'm sending it to
> one of several fields configured
: and ran ant there. I've followed the tutorial but
: highlighting on analyzer debug screen isn't working.
Yep, thanks for reporting this, i've opened a bug to track it...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2315
-Hoss
>
> I'm sorry I don't understand the question. Do you mean to say that
> highlighting works with one but not with another?
>
Yes.
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
>
> >
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> Hmmm .. But ngrams with KeywordTokenizerFactory instead of the
> WhitespaceTokenizerFactory work just as fine. Related issues?
>
>
I'm sorry I don't understand the question. Do you mean to say that
highlighting works with one but not with an
Hmmm .. But ngrams with KeywordTokenizerFactory instead of the
WhitespaceTokenizerFactory work just as fine. Related issues?
Cheers
Avlesh
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
>
> > I hav
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Avlesh Singh wrote:
> I have a "prefix_token" field defined as underneath in my schema.xml
>
> positionIncrementGap="1">
>
>
>
> maxGramSize="20"/>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Searches on the field work fine and as ex
The problem here seems to be that SolrJ can't parse the XML response
comming back from your solr server ... can you check your servlet
container logs and let us know:
1) exactly what URL it says SolrJ is hitting.
2) the response you get when you hit that same url in your browser?
: Caused by:
24 matches
Mail list logo
