n make sure that the server
>> time is not wasted?
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sean Timm [mailto:tim...@aol.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:00 AM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Query regarding setTimeAllowed(
-
From: Sean Timm [mailto:tim...@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 1:00 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query regarding setTimeAllowed(Integer) and
setRows(Integer)
Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
2. If I set SolrQuery.setTimeAllowed(2000) Will this kill query
processing
: Query regarding setTimeAllowed(Integer) and
setRows(Integer)
Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
> 2. If I set SolrQuery.setTimeAllowed(2000) Will this kill query
> processing after 2 secs? (I know this question sounds silly but I just
> want a confirmation from the experts J
That is the idea, but
out based on their
ranks and the top 10 results be returned?
-Kumar
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wunderw...@netflix.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2009 10:06 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Query regarding setTimeAllowed(Integer) and
setRows(Integer
Jana, Kumar Raja wrote:
2. If I set SolrQuery.setTimeAllowed(2000) Will this kill query
processing after 2 secs? (I know this question sounds silly but I just
want a confirmation from the experts J
That is the idea, but only some of the code is within the timer. So,
there are cases where
Requesting 5000 rows will use a lot of server time, because
it has to fetch the information for 5000 results when it
makes the response.
It is much more efficient to request only the results you
will need, usually 10 at a time.
wunder
On 2/17/09 3:30 AM, "Jana, Kumar Raja" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>