Side comment: Is your content field really a string value in your
schema.xml? that's an un-analyzed type and unless you're
always searching for *exactly* the full contents of the field,
you'll have problems
Best
Erick
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Daniel Skiles
daniel.ski...@docfinity.com
It's actually an analyzed String. I figured that out after the first test
run.
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 9:00 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Side comment: Is your content field really a string value in your
schema.xml? that's an un-analyzed type and unless you're
always
Daniel,
This looks like a good usecase for FieldCollapsing (see
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/FieldCollapsing). Perhaps try something like:
group=truegroup.field=documentIdgroup.limit=1group.sort=version desc
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original
Woah. That looks like exactly what I need. Thanks you very much. Is there
any documentation for how to do that using the SolrJ API?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingrambook.comwrote:
Daniel,
This looks like a good usecase for FieldCollapsing (see
, 2011 1:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Return records based on aggregate functions?
Woah. That looks like exactly what I need. Thanks you very much. Is there
any documentation for how to do that using the SolrJ API?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 2:26 PM, Dyer, James james.d
/solrquery_api_for_adding_group_filter
James Dyer
E-Commerce Systems
Ingram Content Group
(615) 213-4311
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Skiles [mailto:daniel.ski...@docfinity.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2011 1:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Return records based on aggregate
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Return records based on aggregate functions?
For response option 1, would I add the group.main=true and
group.format=simple parameters to the SolrQuery object?
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Dyer, James james.d...@ingrambook.comwrote:
For the request end, you can just use
