RE: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6

2012-04-12 Thread randolf.julian
Thanks guys for all the help. We moved to an upgraded O.S. version and the java script worked. - Randolf -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR-3-3-DIH-and-Java-1-6-tp3841355p3905583.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

RE: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6

2012-03-20 Thread Dyer, James
--Original Message- From: Dyer, James [mailto:james.d...@ingrambook.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 9:46 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6 Taking a quick look at the code, it seems this exception could have been thrown for fo

RE: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6

2012-03-20 Thread Dyer, James
Taking a quick look at the code, it seems this exception could have been thrown for four reasons: (see org.apache.solr.handler.dataimport.ScriptTransformer#initEngine) 1. Your JRE doesn't have class "javax.script.ScriptEngineManager" (pre 1.6, loaded here via reflection) 2. Your JRE doesn't

RE: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6

2012-03-20 Thread randolf.julian
Thanks Mikhail and Juampa. How can I prove to our Systems guys that the Rhino Engine is not installed? This is the only way that I can prove that it's not installed and we have to have it for SOLR data importhandler script to run. Thanks again. - Randolf -- View this message in context: http://l

RE: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6

2012-03-20 Thread Juan Pablo Mora
Some versions of the OpenJDK doesn´t include the Rhino Engine to run javascript dataimport. You have to use the Oracle JDK. Juampa. De: randolf.julian [randolf.jul...@dominionenterprises.com] Enviado el: martes, 20 de marzo de 2012 5:41 Para: solr-user@luc

Re: SOLR 3.3 DIH and Java 1.6

2012-03-19 Thread Mikhail Khludnev
Hello, Have you tried jdk 6 from Oracle? On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:41 AM, randolf.julian < randolf.jul...@dominionenterprises.com> wrote: > I am trying to use the data import handler to update SOLR index with Oracle > data. In the SOLR schema, a dynamic field called PHOTO_* has been defined. > I