On Dec 24, 2009, at 11:09 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> I used pagination for a while till found this...
>
>
> I have filtered query ID:[* TO *] returning 20 millions results (no
> faceting), and pagination always seemed to be fast. However, fast only with
> low values for start=12345. Queries like
When do users do a query like that? --wunder
On Dec 24, 2009, at 8:09 AM, Fuad Efendi wrote:
> I used pagination for a while till found this...
>
>
> I have filtered query ID:[* TO *] returning 20 millions results (no
> faceting), and pagination always seemed to be fast. However, fast only with
fwiw, when implementing distributed search i ran into a similar
problem, but then i noticed even google doesnt let you go past page
1000, easier to just set a limit on start
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> When do users do a query like that? --wunder
>
> On Dec 24, 200
On Dec 24, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Walter Underwood wrote:
When do users do a query like that? --wunder
Well, SolrEntityProcessor "users" do :)
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1499
(which by the way I plan on polishing and committing over the
holidays)
Erik
On Dec 24
Some bots will do that, too. Maybe badly written ones, but we saw that at
Netflix. It was causing search timeouts just before a peak traffic period, so
we set a page limit in the front end, something like 200 pages.
It makes sense for that to be very slow, because a request for hit 28838540
mea
; To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR Performance Tuning: Pagination
>
> Some bots will do that, too. Maybe badly written ones, but we saw that at
> Netflix. It was causing search timeouts just before a peak traffic period,
> so we set a page limit in the front end, something
olr call that is
applied to the relevance before sorting.
[It also made me jump through hoops when I wrote some unit tests for the
indexing.]
-Original Message-
From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: December-24-09 1:51 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subj
.
> -Original Message-
> From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
> Sent: December-24-09 11:37 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR Performance Tuning: Pagination
>
> When do users do a query like that? --wunder
>
> On Dec
). But some queries may return huge nuber of documents
(better is to tune "stop-word" list)
-Fuad
> -Original Message-
> From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
> Sent: December-24-09 1:51 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR Perfo
On Dec 24, 2009, at 1:51 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
> Some bots will do that, too. Maybe badly written ones, but we saw that at
> Netflix. It was causing search timeouts just before a peak traffic period, so
> we set a page limit in the front end, something like 200 pages.
>
> It makes sense
At the NOVA Apache Lucene/Solr Meetup last May, one of the speakers
from Near Infinity (Aaron McCurry I think) mentioned that he had a
patch for lucene that enabled unlimited depth memory-efficient paging.
Is anyone in contact with him?
-Peter
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Grant Ingersoll w
nin
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Sun, January 3, 2010 3:37:01 PM
> Subject: Re: SOLR Performance Tuning: Pagination
>
> At the NOVA Apache Lucene/Solr Meetup last May, one of the speakers
> from Near Infinity (Aaron McCurry I think) mentioned that he had a
> patch
un, January 3, 2010 3:37:01 PM
>> Subject: Re: SOLR Performance Tuning: Pagination
>>
>> At the NOVA Apache Lucene/Solr Meetup last May, one of the speakers
>> from Near Infinity (Aaron McCurry I think) mentioned that he had a
>> patch for lucene that enabled unlimi
Si si, that issue.
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Solr - Lucene - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: Peter Wolanin
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Thu, January 7, 2010 9:27:04 PM
> Subject: Re: SOLR Performance Tuning: Pagination
>
> Great -
14 matches
Mail list logo
