Do you really need the *:* stuff in the date range subqueries? That
may add to the execution time.
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Hmmm, what does the rest of your query look like? And does adding
> &debugQuery=on show anything interesting?
>
> Best
> Erick
>
> On Thu, Ap
Hmmm, what does the rest of your query look like? And does adding
&debugQuery=on show anything interesting?
Best
Erick
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:54 AM, Jan Simon Winkelmann <
winkelm...@newsfactory.de> wrote:
> > > ((valid_from:[* TO 2010-04-29T10:34:12Z]) AND
> > > (valid_till:[2010-04-29T10:34
You might want to look at DateMath,
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/util/DateMathParser.html. I
believe the default precision is to the millisecond, so if you afford to round
to the nearest second or even minute you might see some performance gains.
-Kallin Nagelberg
-Ori
> I am currently having serious performance problems with
> date range queries. What I am doing, is validating a
> datasets published status by a valid_from and a valid_till
> date field.
>
> I did get a performance boost of ~ 100% by switching from a
> normal solr.DateField to a solr.TrieDateFie
