Hello,
You can check my record.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3076?focusedCommentId=13415644&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13415644
I'm still working on precise performance measurement.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Eric Khoury wrot
t's impressive.
> I don't currently have build the dev tree, you wouldn't have a patch for
> the alpha build handy?
> If not, when do you think this'll be available in a nightly build?
> Thanks again,
> Eric.
> > From: mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
> &g
Hi Mikhail, was trying to figure out if solr-3076 made it into the beta, but
since the issue is still marked as opened, I take it it didn't yet?Thanks,Eric.
> From: mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
> Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:06:36 +0400
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performanc
> > From: mkhlud...@griddynamics.com
> > Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 00:06:36 +0400
> > Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
> > To: ekhour...@hotmail.com; solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> >
> > Eric,
> >
> > you can take last patch from SOLR-3076
> > [image: Text
Stepping back a bit, the reason you are using multiple cores with a join is
because Solr doesn't have a multi-valued numeric range type. The spatial work
I'm doing in Lucene-spatial does, and it's 2-dimensional for an x & y whereas
your case calls for one dimension. It's taking a bit of time,
Thanks David, that does indeed sound like it'll help. Is there an issue number
I can use to track development\availability?Eric.
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:15:27 +
>
number I can use to track development\availability?Eric.
>> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
>> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:15:27 +
>>
>> Stepping back a bit, the reason you are using multiple co
From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
> Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 20:50:43 +
>
> This one should work for now:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3304
> If you're comfortable with checking out Lucene
You would index rectangles of 0 height but that have a left edge 'x' of the
start time and a right edge 'x' of your end time. You can index a variable
number of these per Solr document and then query by either a point or
another rectangle to find documents which intersect your query shape. It
can
> Subject: RE: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
>
> You would index rectangles of 0 height but that have a left edge 'x' of the
> start time and a right edge 'x' of your end time. You can index a variable
> number of these per Solr document and then query by e
olr-3304 I
suppose?http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrAdaptersForLuceneSpatial4Any idea if
this is going to make it into Solr 4.0? Thanks,Eric.
> Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 07:07:21 -0700
> From: [hidden
> email]
> To: [hidden email]
> Subject: RE: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
>
>
0:42 -0700
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
>
> Solr 4 is certainly the goal. There's a bit of a setback at the moment until
> some of the Lucene spatial API is re-thought. I'm working heavily on such
> thi
otentially use geohash, or
something similar? Geohash looks like it supports seperate "lon" or "lat"
range queries which would help, but its not a multivalue field, which I need.
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:20:42 -0700
> From: [hidden
> email]
> To: [hi
Thanks David, will work around this issue for now, and will keep an eye out for
changes to solr-3304.Good luck with the rethink.Eric.
> Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 08:44:14 -0700
> From: dsmi...@mitre.org
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performa
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
>
> The solr.GeoHashFieldType is useless; I'd like to see it deprecated then
> removed. You'll need to go with unreleased code and apply patches or wait
> till Solr 4.
>
> ~ David
>
need.
> > Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:20:42 -0700
>
> > From: [hidden
> > email]
> > To: [hidden
> > email]
> > Subject: Re: Solr 4.0 - Join performance
> >
> > Solr 4 is certainly the goal. There's a bit of a setback at the moment
> >
16 matches
Mail list logo
