What a solr version, query parameters and debug output?
26.01.2016 6:38 пользователь "Bhawna Asnani"
написал:
> Hi,
> I am using solr multicore join queries for some admin filters. The queries
> are really slow taking up to 40-60 seconds ins some cases.
>
> I recently read that the schema field u
On 8/4/2015 3:30 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> For the last few days I have been trying to correlate the timeouts with GC.
> I noticed in the GC logs that full GC takes long time once in a while. Does
> this mean that the jvm memory is to high or is it set to low?
> 1973953.560: [GC 4474277K->33004
For the last few days I have been trying to correlate the timeouts with GC.
I noticed in the GC logs that full GC takes long time once in a while. Does
this mean that the jvm memory is to high or is it set to low?
[GC 4730643K->3552794K(4890112K), 0.0433146 secs]
1973853.751: [Full GC 3552794K->
Yeah a separate by month or year is good and can really help in this case.
Bill Bell
Sent from mobile
> On Aug 2, 2015, at 5:29 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>
> Shawn,
> Thanks for the feedback. I agree that increasing timeout might alleviate
> the timeout issue. The main problem with increasing t
There are two things that are likely to cause the timeouts you are
seeing, I'd say.
Firstly, your server is overloaded - that can be handled by adding
additional replicas.
However, it doesn't seem like this is the case, because the second query
works fine.
Secondly, you are hitting garbage colle
Shawn,
Thanks for the feedback. I agree that increasing timeout might alleviate
the timeout issue. The main problem with increasing timeout is the
detrimental effect it will have on the user experience, therefore can't
increase it.
I have looked at the queries that threw errors, next time I try it
On 8/2/2015 8:29 AM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> The document contains around 30 fields and have stored set to true for
> almost 15 of them. And these stored fields are queried and updated all the
> time. You will notice that the deleted documents is almost 30% of the
> docs. And it has stayed around t
The document contains around 30 fields and have stored set to true for
almost 15 of them. And these stored fields are queried and updated all the
time. You will notice that the deleted documents is almost 30% of the
docs. And it has stayed around that percent and has not come down.
I did try optim
On 8/1/2015 6:49 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> I currently have a single collection with 40 million documents and index
> size of 25 GB. The collections gets updated every n minutes and as a result
> the number of deleted documents is constantly growing. The data in the
> collection is an amalgamation
40 million docs isn't really very many by modern standards,
although if they're huge documents then that might be an issue.
So is this a single shard or multiple shards? If you're really facing
performance issues, simply making a new collection with more
than one shard (independent of how many rep
Great. Thanks.
That solves my problem.
Greetings
Jochen
André Widhani schrieb:
The first thing I would check is the virtual memory limit (ulimit -v, check
this for the operating system user that runs Tomcat /Solr).
It should be set to "unlimited", but this is as far as i remember not the
de
> I'm waiting on my
> host to add my IP to the
> firewall for me, so I can test that part of it (they setup
> the bog standard
> Solr for me, but I'm now trying to get it working with the
> multicore, as I
> think we are gonna need several Solr instances for
> different parts of the
If you have m
Hi,
I already did answer that one =) I'm waiting on my host to add my IP to the
firewall for me, so I can test that part of it (they setup the bog standard
Solr for me, but I'm now trying to get it working with the multicore, as I
think we are gonna need several Solr instances for different parts
Andy,
try to answer the question other guys asked you .. and not just write something.
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Ahmet Arslan wrote:
> Can you see 'Admin graphics' listed in http://localhost:210/solr/ page?
Regards
Stefan
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 8:57 AM, ultranerds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tha
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. I sure did. I did a bit more research, and found out
that java was still running, so I run:
sudo /etc/init.d/solr stop
...then:
killall java
(just to make sure it was all closed)
...and finally:
sudo /etc/init.d/solr start
Yet I'm still getting the error about the
Did you copy the files into the solr/graphics/ directory? That subdirectory
should be the same name as the instanceDir.
That is you should have this directory structure:
solr/graphics/conf/
solr/graphics/data/index/
On Feb 27, 2011, at 5:20 AM, ultranerds wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to get
> I'm trying to get a Solr install to work with multicores,
> as I wanna use it
> on several sites (each totally different, and I don't
> obviously wanna have
> loads of seperate Solr installs)
>
> Here is what I've done so far (Solr was already uploaded
> and working
> normally, without multicore
Solr generally does not work well over NFS. This looks like a
transient NFS error; apps have to assume that NFS will randomly fail
and that they have to try again.
This may be due to a locking problem. There is a LockFactory class in
Lucene that controls how indexes are shared between programs. So
ject: Re: Solr MultiCore query
Both schema.xml ( in example/multicore/core0/conf and
example/multicore/core1/conf ) already have
* name*
Here are the following query responses:
1)
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr/core0,localhost:8983/solr/core1&q=*:*
025
Both schema.xml ( in example/multicore/core0/conf and
example/multicore/core1/conf ) already have
* name*
Here are the following query responses:
1)
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/select?shards=localhost:8983/solr/core0,localhost:8983/solr/core1&q=*:*
0254MA147LL/AApple 60
GB iPod with Video
Hello joe_coder,
Are you using the default example docs in your queries?
If so, then I see that the word "ipod" appears in a field called "name". By
default, the default search field (defined in solrconfig.xml) is the field
called "text". This means that when you submit a query without specifyin
Thanks ahammad for the quick reply.
As suggested, I am trying out multi core way of implementing the search. I
am trying out the multicore example and getting stuck at an issue. Here is
what I did and the issue I am facing
1) Downloaded 1.4 and started the multicore example using java
-Dsolr.solr
Hello,
I'm not sure what the best way is to do this, but I have done something
identical.
I have the same requirements, ie several datasources. I also used SolrJ and
jsp for this. The way I ended up doing it was to create a multi core
environment, one core per datasource. When I do a query acros
I missed adding some size related information in the query above.
D1 and D2 would have close to 1 million records each
D3 would have ~10 million records.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Solr-MultiCore-query-tp24534383p24534421.html
Sent from the Solr - User maili
>From what I can understand, you have little full-text search involved here.
You should probably look at Hadoop and its contrib and sub-projects such as
Pig, Hive and Chukwa.
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Hive
http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Chukwa
http://incubator.apa
Hi Guys,
Here I'm struggling with to decide whether Solr would be a fitting solution for
me. Highly appreciate you
The key requirements can be summarized as below -
1. Need to process very high volume of data online from log files of various
applications - around 100s of Millions of total size
Thanks Noble for your answer.
Regards,
Sourav
-Original Message-
From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 7:41 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Solr Multicore ...
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:28 AM, souravm <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:28 AM, souravm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Can I use multi core feature to have multiple indexes (That is each core
> would take care of one type of index) within a single Solar instance ?
Yes .And this is why it is conceived
>
> Will there be any performance im
Ryan McKinley wrote:
check the "status" action
also, check the index.jsp page
index.jsp do:
org.apache.solr.core.MultiCore multicore =
(org.apache.solr.core.MultiCore)request.getAttribute("org.apache.solr.MultiCore");
which is ok in a servlet, but how should I do the same inside an
handler,
check the "status" action
also, check the index.jsp page
(i don't have the code in front of me)
On May 9, 2008, at 10:16 AM, Walter Ferrara wrote:
In solr, last trunk version in svn, is it possible to access the
"core registry", or what used to be the static MultiCore object? My
goal is to
: 1. I use the following URL to successfully browse to the Admin interface of
: one of the cores:
:
: http://devbox:8080/solr/solrtest/admin/
:
: 2. On the resulting page, I click on the link [SCHEMA]
:
: 3. This results in a 404 error. The link to this page is
: http://devbox:8080/solr/solrtest
The multicore stuff has changed around a bit since its debut (and may
change some more before the final release) check:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/MultiCore
There is no longer a 'SETASDEFAULT' action and all requests require the
core name, so you will need:
http://localhost:8983/solr/core0/
32 matches
Mail list logo
