: I have an external system that indexes the data.
: One field has a closed set of values, the values are sent as integer but
: should be represented as String. EnumField is perfect for it. The
: problem is that the values are predefined and not order sequentially
: (the values were "spaced"
--Original Message-
From: Elran Dvir
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 9:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: change in EnumField configuration - what do you think?
Thank you for your quick responses.
The numeric values are determined by external system which I don't have any
co
Do you agree?
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Jack Krupansky [mailto:j...@basetechnology.com]
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2014 6:17 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: change in EnumField configuration - what do you think?
Do these numeric values have any significance to the appl
docvalues,
right?
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson
Sent: Monday, June 2, 2014 10:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: change in EnumField configuration - what do you think?
Would both then be supported? I see where it would be easily detectable.
And I
Would both then be supported? I see where it would be easily detectable.
And I also assume that this wouldn't break back-compat?
Best
Erick
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 6:22 AM, Elran Dvir wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am the one that contributed EnumField code to Solr.
> There was a long discussion how th
