Yo. That is the truth. You can get stuff indexed with an automatic schema, but
if you want to make your customers happy, tune it.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
> And, more genera
And, more generally, schemaless makes a series of assumptions, any
of which may be wrong.
You _must_ hand-tweak your schema to squeeze all the performance out of Solr
that you can. If your collection isn't big enough that you need to squeeze,
don't bother
FWIW,
Erick
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at
Yes, and also underflow in the case of double/float.
--
Steve
www.lucidworks.com
> On Jan 22, 2016, at 12:25 PM, Shyam R wrote:
>
> I think, schema-less mode might allocate double instead of float, long
> instead of int to guard against overflow, which increases index size. Is my
> assumption v
I think, schema-less mode might allocate double instead of float, long
instead of int to guard against overflow, which increases index size. Is my
assumption valid?
Thanks
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 10:48 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> I guess it's all about whether schemaless really supports
> 1>
I guess it's all about whether schemaless really supports
1> all the docs you index.
2> all the use-cases for search.
3> the assumptions it makes scale to you needs.
If you've established rigorous tests and schemaless does all of the
above, I'm all for shortening the cycle by using schemaless.
Bu
On 1/21/2016 2:22 AM, Prateek Jain J wrote:
> Thanks Erick,
>
> Yes, I took same approach as suggested by you. The issue is some developers
> started with schemaless configuration and now they have started liking it and
> avoiding restrictions (including increased time to deploy application, in
l have some overhead vs the other; any
thoughts around this?
Regards,
Prateek Jain
Team: Totoro
Mobile: +353 894 391716
-Original Message-
From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com]
Sent: 21 January 2016 02:20 AM
To: solr-user
Subject: Re: schemaless vs schema based core
I would
I would really avoid schemaless in _any_ situation where I know the
schema ahead of time.
bq: But in my case, I am planning to use solrj (so, no spelling mistakes)
On, I'm quite sure there'll be some kind of mistake sometime ;) I know
of at at least one situation where a programming mistake in So
On 1/20/2016 10:17 AM, Prateek Jain J wrote:
What all I could gather from various blogs is, defining schema stops developers
from accidently adding fields to solr. But in my case, I am planning to use
solrj (so, no spelling mistakes). My point is:
1. Is there any advantage like performa
