RE: search with wildcard

2013-11-21 Thread Scott Schneider
> From: Ahmet Arslan [mailto:iori...@yahoo.com] > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 8:40 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: search with wildcard > > Hi Adnreas, > > If you don't want to use wildcards at query time, alternative way is to > use NGrams at ind

Re: search with wildcard

2013-11-21 Thread Ahmet Arslan
Hi Adnreas, If you don't want to use wildcards at query time, alternative way is to use NGrams at indexing time. This will produce a lot of tokens. e.g. For example 4grams of your example : Supertestplan => supe uper pert erte rtes *test* estp stpl tpla plan Is that you want? By the way why do

RE: search with wildcard

2013-11-21 Thread Andreas Owen
I suppose i have to create another field with diffenet tokenizers and set the boost very low so it doesn't really mess with my ranking because there the word is now in 2 fields. What kind of tokenizer can do the job? From: Andreas Owen [mailto:a...@conx.ch] Sent: Donnerstag, 21. November 2013

Re: search with wildcard

2013-11-21 Thread Jack Krupansky
and a better description. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Ahmet Arslan Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 11:40 AM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: search with wildcard Hi Adnreas, If you don't want to use wildcards at query time, alternative way is to use N