Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-03-10 Thread Erick Erickson
Thanks for letting us know! Erick On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote: > For the sake of the story completeness, just wanted to confirm these params > made a positive affect: > > -Dsolr.solr.home=cores -Xmx12000m -Djava.awt.headless=true -XX:+UseParNewGC > -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesCon

Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-03-10 Thread Dmitry Kan
For the sake of the story completeness, just wanted to confirm these params made a positive affect: -Dsolr.solr.home=cores -Xmx12000m -Djava.awt.headless=true -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=8 -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFraction=40

Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-02-17 Thread Dmitry Kan
Thanks Toke! Now I consistently see the saw-tooth pattern on two shards with new GC parameters, next I will try your suggestion. The current params are: -Xmx25600m -XX:+UseParNewGC -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC -XX:MaxTenuringThreshold=8 -XX:CMSInitiatingOccupancyFract

Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-02-17 Thread Toke Eskildsen
On Tue, 2015-02-17 at 11:05 +0100, Dmitry Kan wrote: > Solr: 4.10.2 (high load, mass indexing) > Java: 1.7.0_76 (Oracle) > -Xmx25600m > > > Solr: 4.3.1 (normal load, no mass indexing) > Java: 1.7.0_11 (Oracle) > -Xmx25600m > > The RAM consumption remained the same after the load has stopped on t

Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-02-17 Thread Dmitry Kan
had one :) > > -Original message- > > From:Dmitry Kan > > Sent: Tuesday 17th February 2015 11:40 > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption > > > > Have you found an explanation to that? >

RE: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-02-17 Thread Markus Jelsma
I would have shared it if i had one :) -Original message- > From:Dmitry Kan > Sent: Tuesday 17th February 2015 11:40 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption > > Have you found an explanation to that? > >

Re: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-02-17 Thread Dmitry Kan
Have you found an explanation to that? On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Markus Jelsma wrote: > We have seen an increase between 4.8.1 and 4.10. > > -Original message- > > From:Dmitry Kan > > Sent: Tuesday 17th February 2015 11:06 > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: unusual

RE: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption

2015-02-17 Thread Markus Jelsma
We have seen an increase between 4.8.1 and 4.10. -Original message- > From:Dmitry Kan > Sent: Tuesday 17th February 2015 11:06 > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: unusually high 4.10.2 vs 4.3.1 RAM consumption > > Hi, > > We are currently comparing the RAM consumption of two