hei, Erick, Sorry to bother you again, i send the client requirement to you
in the solr mail list, but i can't get your reply, i want your advice.
2014-05-06 13:24 GMT+08:00 Frankcis [via Lucene]
ml-node+s472066n413486...@n3.nabble.com:
thank you, Erick, you're good man,
this is the client
I don't think so. Solr excels at getting the score of single
documents, not aggregation.
It's not at all clear to me, though, that the sum of documents' scores
is a reasonable thing to sort by. Consider grouping on a very common
term. You'd never do this, but group on the elements of a text
my scheme.xml：
schema name=example core one version=1.1
types
fieldtype name=string class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true
omitNorms=true/
fieldType name=long class=solr.TrieLongField precisionStep=0
positionIncrementGap=0/
fieldType name=uuid class=solr.UUIDField indexed=true /
You haven't answered _why_ this is a good idea. I'm having a hard
time understanding what would be _useful_ about sorting this way. Just
because the sum of scores in a group is greater than the sum of scores
in another says _nothing_ about how relevant any of the docs in the group
are relative to
thank you, Erick, you're right, the maxScore of document within each group is
more effective than the sum of scores in a group, especially some use-case
just as your assumption(group 1 could have 10M documents all with a score of
.01 and group 2 could have 1 document with a score of 1,000 and
thank you, Erick, you're good man,
this is the client requirement:
In the forum, there is a lot of discussion of the content under different
subjects, search for a keyword,
which will lead to a result that the word of content or subject match the
query, group these document based on every subject,
