rity/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
- Original Message
From: Lance Norskog
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 1:45:04 PM
Subject: Re: Recap on derived objects in Solr Index, 'schema in a can'
A dynam
rs’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them yourself.
> from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
>
>
> EARTH has a Right To Life,
> otherwise we all die.
>
>
>
> - Original Message
> From: Erick Erickson
> To
do not have to make them yourself.
from 'http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=4501&tag=nl.e036'
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
- Original Message
From: Erick Erickson
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wed, December 22, 2010 10:44:27 AM
Subjec
No, one cannot ignore the schema. If you try to add a field not in the
schema you get
an error. One could, however, use any arbitrary subset
of the fields defined in the schema for any particular #document# in the
index. Say
your schema had fields f1, f2, f3...f10. You could have fields f1-f5 in on
Based on more searches and manual consolidation, I've put together some of
the ideas for this already suggested in a summary below. The last item in the
summary
seems to be interesting, low technical cost way of doing it.
Basically, it treats the index like a 'BigTable', a la "No SQL".
Erick Er
