SOLR 4.x vs 3.x parsedquery differences

2013-09-06 Thread Raúl Cardozo
I'm migrating from 3.x to 4.x and I'm running some queries to verify that everything works like before. I've found however that the query galaxy s3 is giving much less results. In 3.x numFound=1628, in 4.x numFound=70. Here's the relevant schema part: fieldtype name=text_pt class=solr.TextField

Re: SOLR 4.x vs 3.x parsedquery differences

2013-09-06 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I'm migrating from 3.x to 4.x and I'm running some queries to verify that : everything works like before. I've found however that the query galaxy s3 : is giving much less results. In 3.x numFound=1628, in 4.x numFound=70. is your entire schema 100% identical in both cases? what is the

Re: SOLR 4.x vs 3.x parsedquery differences

2013-09-06 Thread Fermin Silva
checking why that was so since we'll be moving away from the older version, which shows the inconsistency. But thanks a million. If you have a SO user I can mark yours as answer here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18661996/solr-4-x-vs-3-x-parsedquery-differences Cheers On Sep 6, 2013 4:15 PM

Re: SOLR 4.x vs 3.x parsedquery differences

2013-09-06 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Our schema is identical except the version. : In 3.x it's 1.1 and in 4.x it's 1.5. That's kind of a significant difference to leave out -- indepenent of the question you are asking about here, it's going to make quite a few differences in how things are being being parsed, and what defaults

Re: SOLR 4.x vs 3.x parsedquery differences

2013-09-06 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 9/6/2013 12:46 PM, Fermin Silva wrote: Our schema is identical except the version. In 3.x it's 1.1 and in 4.x it's 1.5. Also in solrconfig.xml we have no lucene version for 3.x (so it's using 2_4 i believe) and in 4.x we fixed it to 4_4. The autoGeneratePhraseQueries parameter didn't exist

Re: SOLR 4.x vs 3.x parsedquery differences

2013-09-06 Thread Fermin Silva
Hi, Our schema is identical except the version. In 3.x it's 1.1 and in 4.x it's 1.5. Also in solrconfig.xml we have no lucene version for 3.x (so it's using 2_4 i believe) and in 4.x we fixed it to 4_4. Thanks On Sep 6, 2013 3:34 PM, Chris Hostetter hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote: : I'm