On 11/23/2016 11:27 AM, Prateek Jain J wrote:
> 1. Solr is indexing engine but it stores both data and indexes in same
> directory. Although we can select fields to store/persist in solr via
> schema.xml. But in nutshell, it's not possible to distinguish between data
> and indexes like, I
gs, which
> can be used to re-build database.
>
> Regards,
> Prateek Jain
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
> Sent: 24 November 2016 05:14 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>
>
...@wunderwood.org]
Sent: 24 November 2016 05:14 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Sure. Someone sends an HTTP request that deletes all the content. I’m glad to
share the curl request.
Or you can put content in with fields that are indexed but not stored. Then the
content is “gone
]
Sent: 24 November 2016 12:47 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Well, I didn’t actually recommend MongoDB as a repository. :-)
If you want transactions and search, buy MarkLogic. I worked there for two
years, and that is serious non-muggle technology.
wunder
Walter
t; Will someone please give me a detailed scenario where solr content could
>> "disappear"?
>>
>> Disappear means what exactly?
>>
>> TIA,
>> Kris
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Walter Underwood [mailto:wun.
Walter Underwood [mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 7:47 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>
> Well, I didn’t actually recommend MongoDB as a repository. :-)
>
> If you want transactions and search, bu
rg
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Well, I didn’t actually recommend MongoDB as a repository. :-)
If you want transactions and search, buy MarkLogic. I worked there for two
years, and that is serious non-muggle technology.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
csson.com> wrote:
>>>> SOLR also supports, schemaless behaviour. and my question is same that,
>>>> why and where should we prefer mongodb. Web search didn’t helped me on
>>>> this.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>
prateek.j.j...@ericsson.com> wrote:
>>> SOLR also supports, schemaless behaviour. and my question is same that, why
>>> and where should we prefer mongodb. Web search didn’t helped me on this.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Prateek Jain
>>>
>>
helped me on this.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Prateek Jain
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Rohit Kanchan [mailto:rohitkan2...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: 23 November 2016 07:07 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>&g
mongodb. Web search didn’t helped me on this.
>
>
> Regards,
> Prateek Jain
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Rohit Kanchan [mailto:rohitkan2...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 23 November 2016 07:07 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
>
> H
-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SOLR vs mongdb
Hi Prateek,
I think you are talking about two different animals. Solr(actually embedded
lucene) is actually a search engine where you can use different features like
faceting, highlighting etc but it is a document store where for each text it
does
Hi Prateek,
I think you are talking about two different animals. Solr(actually embedded
lucene) is actually a search engine where you can use different features
like faceting, highlighting etc but it is a document store where for each
text it does create an Inverted index and map that to
Hi All,
I have started to use mongodb and solr recently. Please feel free to correct me
where my understanding is not upto the mark:
1. Solr is indexing engine but it stores both data and indexes in same
directory. Although we can select fields to store/persist in solr via
schema.xml.
14 matches
Mail list logo
