Thanks Shawn for the Input, I could actually get RAID10's.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-SAN-vs-Local-Disk-tp4041299p4041895.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2/20/2013 1:12 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 18:39 +0100, chamara wrote:
Hi Thanks Shawn for the Input, Yes i am using SolrCloud to replicate the
index to another server running with the same spec with 32cores and 72GB RAM
on each machine. I have to test the performance of R
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 18:39 +0100, chamara wrote:
> Hi Thanks Shawn for the Input, Yes i am using SolrCloud to replicate the
> index to another server running with the same spec with 32cores and 72GB RAM
> on each machine. I have to test the performance of RAID 10? Have you ever
> done a deployment
On 2/19/2013 10:39 AM, chamara wrote:
Hi Thanks Shawn for the Input, Yes i am using SolrCloud to replicate the
index to another server running with the same spec with 32cores and 72GB RAM
on each machine. I have to test the performance of RAID 10? Have you ever
done a deployment with RAID 10? The
see
, so it is going to be lots of writes to the DISK.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-SAN-vs-Local-Disk-tp4041299p4041343.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2/19/2013 8:30 AM, chamara wrote:
Hi Guys,
I know you all have came across this when doing hardware configuration, If
i use all the bells and whistles version of SAN is that enough to out power
Physical disk?
Also my topology is to have 5 shards in one Machine.
The reasons for or against
://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SOLR4-SAN-vs-Local-Disk-tp4041299.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
