On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 05:44:30PM -0800, Erick Erickson wrote:
> No, the idea is that you have N single valued fields, one for each of
> the MV entries you have. The copyField dest would be MV, and only used
> in those cases you wanted to match across values. Not saying that's a
> great solution,
bq. multiple fields acts as a MV field
No, the idea is that you have N single valued fields, one for each of
the MV entries you have. The copyField dest would be MV, and only used
in those cases you wanted to match across values. Not saying that's a
great solution, or if it would even necessarily
On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 09:30:33AM -0800, Erick Erickson wrote:
> Have you looked at ComplexPhraseQueryParser here?
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/other-parsers.html
Sure. However, I am using multi-word synonyms and so far the
complexphrase does not handle them. (maybe soon ?)
> Depen
Have you looked at ComplexPhraseQueryParser here?
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/other-parsers.html
But no, there are no plans that I know of to include something that
has the notion of searching within MV fields.
Depending on how many of these you have, you could do something with
dyna
hi
This question is highly related to a previous one found on the
mailing-list archive [1].
I have this document:
"content_txt":["001 first","002 second"]
I d'like the below query return nothing:
> q=content_txt:(first AND second)
The method proposed ([1]) by Erick works ok to look for a single
