RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-26 Thread Ben McCarthy
then work across the whole index? Thanks Ben -Original Message- From: Tomás Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 15:10 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question Also, what happens if, instead of adding the 40K docs you add

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-26 Thread Erick Erickson
Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 15:10 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question Also, what happens if, instead of adding the 40K docs you add just one and commit? 2012/3/23 Tomás Fernández Löbbe tomasflo...@gmail.com

RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-26 Thread Ben McCarthy
That's great information. Thanks for all the help and guidance, its been invaluable. Thanks Ben -Original Message- From: Erick Erickson [mailto:erickerick...@gmail.com] Sent: 26 March 2012 12:21 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question It's

Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Ben McCarthy
Hello, Im looking at the replication from a master to a number of slaves. I have configured it and it appears to be working. When updating 40K records on the master is it standard to always copy over the full index, currently 5gb in size. If this is standard what do people do who have

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Martin Koch
I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we move around 150G/hour when hooking up a new slave to the master. /Martin On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Ben McCarthy ben.mccar...@tradermedia.co.uk wrote: Hello, Im looking at the replication from a master to a number of slaves. I

RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Ben McCarthy
So do you just simpy address this with big nic and network pipes. -Original Message- From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 14:07 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
Message- From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 14:07 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we move around 150G/hour when hooking up a new slave to the master. /Martin

RE: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Ben McCarthy
. -Original Message- From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 14:07 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we move around 150G/hour when hooking up a new slave to the master

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
. -Original Message- From: Martin Koch [mailto:m...@issuu.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 14:07 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question I guess this would depend on network bandwidth, but we move around 150G/hour when hooking up a new slave

Re: Simple Slave Replication Question

2012-03-23 Thread Tomás Fernández Löbbe
Fernández Löbbe [mailto:tomasflo...@gmail.com] Sent: 23 March 2012 14:29 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: Simple Slave Replication Question Hi Ben, only new segments are replicated from master to slave. In a situation where all the segments are new, this will cause the index to be fully