Mixing fuzzy with phonetic can give bizarre matches. I worked on a search
engine that did that.
You really don't want to mix stemming, phonetic, and fuzzy. They are distinct
transformations of the surface word that do different things.
Stemming: conflate different inflections of the same word,
No, ComplexPhraseQuery has been around for quite a while but
never incorporated into the code base, it's pretty much what you
need to do both fuzzy and phrase at once.
But, doesn't phonetic really incorporate at least a flavor of fuzzy?
Is it close enough for your needs to just do phonetic matches
sry , i copied it wrong. Below is the correct analysis.
Index time
ST
trinity
services
SF
trinity
services
LCF
trinity
services
SF
trinity
services
SF
trinity
services
WDF
trinity
services
SF
triniti
servic
PF
TRNTtriniti
SRFKservic
HWF
TRNTtriniti
SRFKservic
PSF
TRNTtriniti
SRFKservic
*Query
hi Erick,
Yes it is correct. These results are because of stemming + phonetic
matching. Below is the
Index time
ST
trinity
services
SF
trinity
services
LCF
trinity
services
SF
trinity
services
SF
trinity
services
WDF
trinity
services
Query time
SF
triniti
servic
PF
TRNTtriniti
SRFKservic
HWF
TRN
The first thing I'd recommend is to look at the admin/analysis
page. I suspect you aren't seeing fuzzy query results
at all, what you're seeing is the result of stemming.
Stemming is algorithmic, so sometimes produces very
surprising results, i.e. Trinidad and Trinigee may stem
to something like t
Hi,
with solr 4.0 the fuzzy query syntax is like ~1 (or 2)
Proximity search is like "value"~20.
How does this differentiate between the two searches. My thought was
promiximity would be on phrases and fuzzy on individual words. Is that
correct?
I wasnted to do a promiximity search for text field
