Thank you for the detailed response Shawn! I've read it several times.
Yes, that particular machine has 12 cores that are hyper-threaded. Does
Solr do something special when not running in HDFS to allocate memory
that would result in VIRT showing memory required for index data size?
In my e
On 8/18/2017 1:05 PM, Joe Obernberger wrote:
> Thank you Shawn. Please see:
> http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta
> for screen shots of top
> (http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_top.jpg) and
> several screen shots over various times of jvisualvm.
>
> There is also the GC log and th
Ah! Yes - that makes much more sense:
CPU: http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_CPU.jpg
Mem: http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_Mem.jpg
-Joe
On 8/18/2017 3:35 PM, Michael Braun wrote:
When I recommended JVisualVM, specifically the "Sampling" portion of
the app -
Hi Walter - I see what you are saying, but the machine is not actively
swapping (that would be the concern - right?) It's the CPU usage that
I'm trying to figure out. Htop reports that there is about 20G of disk
cache in use, and about 76G of RAM in use by programs. VIRT memory is
what was re
I see a server with 100Gb of memory and processes (java and jsvc) using 203Gb
of virtual memory. Hmm.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:05 PM, Joe Obernberger
> wrote:
>
> Thank you Shawn. Please see:
> http://w
Thank you Shawn. Please see:
http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta
for screen shots of top
(http://www.lovehorsepower.com/Vesta/VestaSolr6.6.0_top.jpg) and several
screen shots over various times of jvisualvm.
There is also the GC log and the regular solr.log for one server (named
Vesta). Ple
On 8/18/2017 10:37 AM, Joe Obernberger wrote:
> Indexing about 15 million documents per day across 100 shards on 45
> servers. Up until about 350 million documents, each of the solr
> instances was taking up about 1 core (100% CPU). Recently, they all
> jumped to 700%. Is this normal? Anything
I was able to attach to one server by changing the startup and adding:
|-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.local.only=false \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.ssl=false \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.authenticate=false \
-Dcom.sun.management.jmxremote.port=18983 \
Thank you Michael. Oddly when I start jstatd on one of the servers, I
see all the JVM processes in jvisualvm except the solr one! Any idea why?
On 8/18/2017 12:43 PM, Michael Braun wrote:
Have you attached JVisualVM or a similar application to the process to
sample where the time is being sp
Have you attached JVisualVM or a similar application to the process to
sample where the time is being spent? It can be very helpful for debugging
this sort of problem.
On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Joe Obernberger <
joseph.obernber...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Indexing about 15 million documents pe
Indexing about 15 million documents per day across 100 shards on 45
servers. Up until about 350 million documents, each of the solr
instances was taking up about 1 core (100% CPU). Recently, they all
jumped to 700%. Is this normal? Anything that I can check for?
I don't see anything unusua
11 matches
Mail list logo
