Re: Solr Cloud, Commits and Master/Slave configuration

2012-03-01 Thread eks dev
Thanks Mark, Good, this is probably good enough to give it a try. My analyzers are normally fast, doing duplicate analysis (at each replica) is probably not going to cost a lot, if there is some decent "batching" Can this be somehow controlled (depth of this buffer / time till flush or some such

Re: Solr Cloud, Commits and Master/Slave configuration

2012-02-29 Thread Mark Miller
We actually do currently batch updates - we are being somewhat loose when we say a document at a time. There is a buffer of updates per replica that gets flushed depending on the requests coming through and the buffer size. - Mark Miller lucidimagination.com On Feb 28, 2012, at 3:38 AM, eks dev

Re: Solr Cloud, Commits and Master/Slave configuration

2012-02-28 Thread eks dev
SolrCluod is going to be great, NRT feature is really huge step forward, as well as central configuration, elasticity ... The only thing I do not yet understand is treatment of cases that were traditionally covered by Master/Slave setup. Batch update If I get it right (?), updates to replicas are

Re: Solr Cloud, Commits and Master/Slave configuration

2012-02-27 Thread Erick Erickson
As I understand it (and I'm just getting into SolrCloud myself), you can essentially forget about master/slave stuff. If you're using NRT, the soft commit will make the docs visible, you don't ned to do a hard commit (unlike the master/slave days). Essentially, the update is sent to each shard lead

Solr Cloud, Commits and Master/Slave configuration

2012-02-27 Thread roz dev
Hi All, I am trying to understand features of Solr Cloud, regarding commits and scaling. - If I am using Solr Cloud then do I need to explicitly call commit (hard-commit)? Or, a soft commit is okay and Solr Cloud will do the job of writing to disk? - Do We still need to use Master