rial yet. Want to give that a try first?
Otis
--
Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch
- Original Message
> From: mahendra mahendra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 6:30:27 PM
> Subject: Re: Solr
ng to
increase, the old doc is physically not going to delete.
Any Idea on this..
Thanks & Regards,
Mahendra
--- On Sat, 9/27/08, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Solr performance for Instance updates
To: solr-u
Hi,
- Original Message
> From: mahendra mahendra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008 3:52:57 PM
> Subject: Solr performance for Instance updates
>
> Hi,
>
> We want to update the index based on T
Hi,
We want to update the index based on TIB listener, whenever database changes
happens we want to update my index instantly this may happen very frequently
for number of records.
Could anyone please tell me how would be the performance for these scenarios?
Question related linguistic supp
