On 04/07/17 18:10, Erick Erickson wrote:
> I think you'll get what you expect by something like:
> (*:* -someField:Foo) AND (otherField: (Bar OR Baz))
Yeah that's what I figured. It's not a big deal since we generate Solr
syntax using a parser/generator on top of our own query syntax. Still a
litt
First of all, Solr doesn't implement strict boolean logic, see Hoss'
explanation here:
https://lucidworks.com/2011/12/28/why-not-and-or-and-not/
And bare "not" operators are a pain. There's actually _some_ trickery
_some_ places
to help you out (fq clauses come to mind) and prepend *:* for you.
I
Hey folks,
I'm experiencing some strange query behaviour, and it isn't immediately
clear to me why this wouldn happen. The definition of the query syntax
on the wiki is a bit fuzzy, so my interpretation of the syntax might be off.
This query does work (no results, when results are expected).
(-s
