t a quick test and it
> definitely seems to work for the examples I've gave.
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Scott
>
>
> From: Nikolas Tautenhahn [via Lucene]
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 3:14 PM
> To: Scottie
> Subject: Re: Tokenising on Each Letter
>
>
> Hi Scotti
Nikolas, thanks a lot for that, I've just gave it a quick test and it
definitely seems to work for the examples I've gave.
Thanks again,
Scott
From: Nikolas Tautenhahn [via Lucene]
Sent: Monday, August 23, 2010 3:14 PM
To: Scottie
Subject: Re: Tokenising on Each Letter
Hi Scottie,
> Could you elaborate about N gram for me, based on my schema?
just a quick reply:
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
>
>
>
> generateNumberParts="0" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="0" catenateAll="0"
> splitOnCaseChange="1" splitOnNumerics="0
r the detailed reply.
Scott
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tokenising-on-Each-Letter-tp1247113p1291984.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lit a
> certain field over each letter or wildcard etc?
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Scott
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tokenising-on-Each-Letter-tp1247113p1247113.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
ge in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Tokenising-on-Each-Letter-tp1247113p1247113.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
