Hoping I can get a better response with a more directed question:
With facet queries and the fields used, what qualifies as a large number
of values? The wiki uses U.S. states as an example, so the number of unique
values = 50. More to the point, is there an algorithm that I can use to
On 4/2/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hoping I can get a better response with a more directed question:
I haven't answered your original question as it seems that general
java memory debugging techniques would be the most useful thing here.
With facet queries and the fields
On 4/1/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our scenario: 150MB index, 14 documents, read/write servers in place
using standard replication. Running Tomcat 5.5.17 on Redhat Enterprise
Linux 4. Java configured to start with -Xmx1024m. We encounter java heap
out-of-memory issues on
On 4/2/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/1/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Our scenario: 150MB index, 14 documents, read/write servers in place
using standard replication. Running Tomcat 5.5.17 on Redhat Enterprise
Linux 4. Java configured to start with
Thanks for the pointers, Mike. I'm trying to determine the math to resolve
some strange numbers we're seeing. Here's the top dozen lines from a jmap
analysis on a heap dump:
SizeCount Class description
-
428246064 1792204
On 4/2/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are doing incremental updates, and we optimize quite a bit. mergeFactor
presently set to 10.
maxDoc count = 144156
numDocs count = 144145
What version of Solr are you using? Another potential OOM (multiple
threads generating the same
Sorry for the confusion. We do have caching disabled. I was asking the
question because I wasn't certain if the configurable cache settings applied
throughout, or if the FieldCache in lucene still came in play.
The two integer-based facets are single valued per document. The
string-based
Major version is 1.0. The bits are from a nightly build from early
September 2006.
We do have plans to upgrade solr soon.
On 4/2/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/2/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are doing incremental updates, and we optimize quite a
bit.
Yonik - is this the JIRA entry you're referring to?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-754
On 4/2/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/2/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are doing incremental updates, and we optimize quite a
bit. mergeFactor
presently set
On 4/2/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yonik - is this the JIRA entry you're referring to?
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-754
Yes. But from the heap dump you provided, that doesn't look like the issue.
-Yonik
10 matches
Mail list logo
