Oops. Obviously facet fields must be indexed. Not sure what I was thinking
at the moment.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kuhlmann
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2012 8:54 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Urgent: Facetable but not Searchable Field
On
On 01.08.2012 15:40, Jack Krupansky wrote:
The "indexed" and "stored" field attributes are independent, so you can
define a facet field as "stored" but not "indexed" (stored="true"
indexed="false"), so that the field can be faceted but not indexed.
?
A field must be indexed to be used for face
, 2012 6:58 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org ; solr-user-h...@lucene.apache.org ;
solr-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Urgent: Facetable but not Searchable Field
All,
We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 7:58 AM, jayakeerthi s wrote:
> We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
> but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
The user fields "uf" feature of the edismax parser may work for you:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ExtendedDisMax
On 01.08.2012 13:58, jayakeerthi s wrote:
We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
Simply don't search for it, then it's not searchable.
Or do I simply don't understand your question? As long as Dismax doesn
All,
We have a requirement, where we need to implement 2 fields as Facetable,
but the values of the fields should not be Searchable.
Please let me know is this feature Supported in Solr If yes what would be
the Configuration to be done in Schema.xml and Solrconfig.xml to achieve
the same.
This i
