Re: Using QueryElevationComponent without specifying top results?

2010-04-29 Thread Lance Norskog
What you want is: All results within the area and whatever results the QueryElevateComponent adds, sorted by some relevance function. If this is it, you can get the results, with the elevated output, and do a second query with all of the ids, sorted by distance. This second query would not use

Re: Using QueryElevationComponent without specifying top results?

2010-04-29 Thread Oliver Beattie
Just wondering if anyone had any further thoughts on how I might do this? On 26 April 2010 19:18, Oliver Beattie wrote: > Hi Grant, > > Thanks for getting back to me. Yes, indeed, #1 is exactly what I'm looking > for. Results are already ranked by distance (among other things), but we > need the

Re: Using QueryElevationComponent without specifying top results?

2010-04-26 Thread Oliver Beattie
Hi Grant, Thanks for getting back to me. Yes, indeed, #1 is exactly what I'm looking for. Results are already ranked by distance (among other things), but we need the ability to manually include a certain result in the set. They wouldn't usually match, because they fall outside the radius of the f

Re: Using QueryElevationComponent without specifying top results?

2010-04-26 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Apr 26, 2010, at 7:53 AM, Oliver Beattie wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm currently writing an application that uses Solr, and we'd like to use > something like the QueryElevationComponent, without having to specify which > results appear top. For example, what we really need is a way to say "for > t

Using QueryElevationComponent without specifying top results?

2010-04-26 Thread Oliver Beattie
Hi all, I'm currently writing an application that uses Solr, and we'd like to use something like the QueryElevationComponent, without having to specify which results appear top. For example, what we really need is a way to say "for this search, include these results as part of the result set, and