Has this logic (default constructor or version flag) changed due to
LUCENE-4877 ? I rerun my tool and suddenly huge number of Factories
acquired a new constructor (e.g. MappingCharFilterFactory).
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/a
: *) Have a default empty constructor
:
: My preliminary tests seem to indicate this is the case. Am I missing
: anything.
Any analyzer that has an empty construct *or* a constructor that takes in
a lucene "Version" object may be specified.
I've updated the wiki to make this more clear...
http
gt; Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 10:32 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: What makes an Analyzer/Tokenizer/CharFilter/**etc suitable for
> Solr?
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I want to have a unified reference of all different processors one could
> u
apache.org
Subject: What makes an Analyzer/Tokenizer/CharFilter/etc suitable for Solr?
Hello,
I want to have a unified reference of all different processors one could
use in Solr in various extension points.
I have written a small tool to extract all implementations
of UpdateRequestProcessorFactory
Hello,
I want to have a unified reference of all different processors one could
use in Solr in various extension points.
I have written a small tool to extract all implementations
of UpdateRequestProcessorFactory, Analyzer, CharFilterFactory, etc
(actually of any root class).
However, I assume n
