n Yonik page, there are some test that shows how JSON Facet Api
> performs
> > > better than legacy facets, also the Api was way simpler than the pivot
> > > facets, so in my case that was enough to base my solution around the
> JSON
> > > Api. But I would like to know what are the thoughts of the solr
> > developers.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Which-line-is-solr-following-in-terms-of-a-BI-Tool-tp4269597.html
> > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> >
>
> better than legacy facets, also the Api was way simpler than the pivot
> > facets, so in my case that was enough to base my solution around the JSON
> > Api. But I would like to know what are the thoughts of the solr
> developers.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Which-line-is-solr-following-in-terms-of-a-BI-Tool-tp4269597.html
> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
simpler than the pivot
facets, so in my case that was enough to base my solution around the JSON
Api. But I would like to know what are the thoughts of the solr developers.
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Which-line-is-solr-following-in-terms-of-a-BI
