or JVM in 32bits box. Therefore we set JAVA_OPTIONS to
> "-Xms521m -Xmx1400m". Is my understanding right?
>
> Thanks.
>
>> From: Lance Norskog
>> Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, newsam
>> Subject: Re: Why t
cene.apache.org
>To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org, newsam
>Subject: Re: Why the query performance is so different for queries?
>Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:13:20 -0700
>
>How much ram does the JVM have?
>
>Wildcard queries are slow. Starting with '*' are even slower. If
How much ram does the JVM have?
Wildcard queries are slow. Starting with '*' are even slower. If you
want all values try "field:[* TO *]". This is a range query and lets
you pick a range of values- this picks everything.
The "*:*" is not a wildcard. It is a magic syntax for "all documents"
and do
Hi guys,
I have posted a thread "The search response time is too long".
The SOLR searcher instance is deployed with Tomcat 5.5.21.
.
The index file is 8.2G. The doc num is 6110745. DELL Server has Intel(R)
Xeon(TM) CPU (4 cores) 3.00GHZ and 6G RAM.
In SOLR back-end, "query=key:*" costs alm
