Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-11 Thread Jack Krupansky
idea. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:37 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option? Hello, I have asked a question recently about solr l

Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-11 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
are best for a frequent update scenario. > > > > > > Multivalues fields are great for storing a relatively small list of > > > values. You can add to the list easily, but under the hood, Solr must > > read > > > and rewrite the full list as well a

Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-11 Thread Marcelo Elias Del Valle
well as the full document. And, there is no > > way to address or synchronize individual elements of multivalued fields. > > > > Joins are great... if used in moderation. Heavy use of joins is not a > > great idea. > > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > >

Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-11 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
use of joins is not a > great idea. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:37 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization > always the best opt

Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-10 Thread Jack Krupansky
long run. -- Jack Krupansky -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 6:52 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option? Jack, When you say: "large num

Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-10 Thread Roman Chyla
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Marcelo Elias Del Valle wrote: > Hello, > > I have asked a question recently about solr limitations and some about > joins. It comes that this question is about both at the same time. > I am trying to figure how to denormalize my data so I will need just 1

Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-10 Thread Marcelo Elias Del Valle
f used in moderation. Heavy use of joins is not a > great idea. > > -- Jack Krupansky > > -Original Message- From: Marcelo Elias Del Valle > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:37 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: amount of values in a multi value field - is

Re: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-10 Thread Jack Krupansky
Wednesday, July 10, 2013 5:37 PM To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option? Hello, I have asked a question recently about solr limitations and some about joins. It comes that this question is about both at the

amount of values in a multi value field - is denormalization always the best option?

2013-07-10 Thread Marcelo Elias Del Valle
Hello, I have asked a question recently about solr limitations and some about joins. It comes that this question is about both at the same time. I am trying to figure how to denormalize my data so I will need just 1 document in my index instead of performing a join. I figure one way of doi