RE: can't make sense of spellchecker results when using techproducts example

2015-01-14 Thread Chris Hostetter
-0600 : From: "Dyer, James" : Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org : To: "solr-user@lucene.apache.org" : Subject: RE: can't make sense of spellchecker results when using techproducts : example : : Chris, : : - DirectSpellChecker has a setting for "minPrefix"

RE: can't make sense of spellchecker results when using techproducts example

2015-01-09 Thread Dyer, James
struggle for me when I was a new user, and I know we get lots of questions on the user-list about it. My apologies to you for not answering this sooner. James Dyer Ingram Content Group -Original Message- From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org] Sent: Wednesday, December

can't make sense of spellchecker results when using techproducts example

2014-12-17 Thread Chris Hostetter
Ok, so i've been working on updating hte ref guide to account for hte new way to run the "examples" in 5.0. The spell checking page... https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Spell+Checking ...has some examples that loosely corroloate to the "techproducts" example, but even